ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefi ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefi

Is Ventoy checking md5sums and refusing to load an iso that doesn't match or something? Do NOT put the file to the 32MB VTOYEFI partition. Some commands in Ventoy grub can modify the contents of the ISO and must be disabled for users to use on their own under secure boot. 04-23-2021 02:00 PM. Does shim still needed in this case? pentoo-full-amd64-hardened-2020.0_p20200527.iso - 4 GB, avg_arl_cdi_all_120_160420a12074.iso - 178 MB, Fedora-Security-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20200419.n.0.iso - 1.80 GB I don't remember if the shortcut is ctrl i or ctrl r for grub mode. *lil' bow* I am getting the same error, and I confirmed that the iso has UEFI support. # Archlinux minimal Install with btrfs ## Introduction If you don't know about Arch Linux, and willing to learn, then check this post, - [Arch Linux](https://wiki . GRUB mode fixed it! Maybe the image does not suport IA32 UEFI! For Hiren's BootCD HBCD_PE_x64.iso has been tested in UEFI mode. and leave it up to the user. I've already disabled secure boot. By default, the ISO partition can not be mounted after boot Linux (will show device busy when you mount). So if the ISO doesn't support UEFI mode itself, the boot will fail. But that not means they trust all the distros booted by Ventoy. Is it possible to make a UEFI bootable arch USB? There are many kinds of WinPE. https://nyancat.fandom.com/wiki/MEMZ_Nyan_Cat I will test it in a realmachine later. 2. Only in 2019 the signature validation was enforced. relativo a la imagen iso a utilizar then there is no point in implementing a USB-based Secure Boot loader. Won't it be annoying? If you burn the image to a CD, and use a USB CD drive, I bet you find it will install fine. You signed in with another tab or window. I see your point, this CorePlus ISO is indeed missing that EFI file. @pbatard, if that's what what your concern, that could be easily fixed by deleting grubia32.efi and grubx64.efi in /EFI/BOOT, and renaming grubia32_real.efi grubia32.efi, grubx64_real.efi grubx64.efi. Attached Files Thumbnail (s) Find Reply Steve2926 Senior Member and windows password recovery BootCD Windows 7 32-bit does not support UEFI32 - you must use Win7 64-bit.. You may need to disable Secure Boot in your BIOS settings first (or convert the ISO to a .imgPTN23 file using the MPI Tool Kit). , ctrl+alt+del . 2.-verificar que la arquitectura de la imagen iso sea compatible con el procesador, 1.-modo uefi: and reboot.pro.. and to tinybit specially :) I was able to create a Rufus image using "GPT for UEFI" and the latest Windows ISO (1709 updated in 12/2017). After installation, simply click the Start Scan button and then press on Repair All. I'll try looking into the changelog on the deb package and see if Probably you didn't delete the file completely but to the recycle bin. Rufus or WoeUSB, in several meaningful ways.The program does not extract ISO images or other image formats to the USB drive but . Already on GitHub? Open File Explorer and head to the directory where you keep your boot images. Its also a bit faster than openbsd, at least from my experience. To add Ventoy to Easy2Boot v2, download the latest version of Ventoy Windows .ZIP file and drag-and-drop the Ventoy zip file onto the \e2b\Update agFM\Add_Ventoy.cmd file on the 2nd agFM partition. Most likely it was caused by the lack of USB 3.0 driver in the ISO. @blackcrack If you really want to mount it, you can use the experimental option VTOY_LINUX_REMOUNT in Global Control Plugin. Which is why you want to have as many of these enabled in parallel when they exist (such as TPM + Secure Boot, i.e. MEMZ.img is 4K and Ventoy does not list it in it's menu system. I've made another patched preloader with Secure Boot support. That doesn't mean that it cannot validate the booloaders that are being chainloaded. Well occasionally send you account related emails. Let us know in the comments which solution worked for you. ***> wrote: The main point of Secure Boot is to prevent (or at least warn about) the execution of bootloaders that have not been vetted by Microsoft or one of the third parties that Microsoft signed a shim for (such as Red Hat). No idea what's wrong with the sound lol. Ventoy loads Linux kernels directly, which are also signed with embedded Shim certificate. Option 1: doesn't support secure boot at all Okay, I installed linux mint 64 bit on this laptop before. So maybe Ventoy also need a shim as fedora/ubuntu does. It should be specially noted that, no matter USB drive or local disk, all the data will be lost after install Ventoy, please be very careful. I made a larger MEMZ.img and that runs on Easy2Boot and grubfm in VBOX but it goes wrong booting via Ventoy for some reason. @ValdikSS, I'm not seeing much being debated, when the link you point to appears to indicate that pretty much everybody is in agreement that loading unsigned kernels from GRUB, in a Secure Boot environment, is a bug (hence why it was reported as such). And unfortunately, because Ventoy is derived from GRUB 2.0, the only way it could run in a Secure Boot environment (without using MokManager) is if it is loaded through a SHIM. Menu. Already have an account? Else I would have disabled Secure Boot altogether, since the end result it the same. Both are good. I've been trying to do something I've done a milliion times before: This has always worked for me. With that with recent versions, all seems to work fine. en_windows_10_business_editions_version_2004_updated_may_2020_x64_dvd_aa8db2cc.iso If you did the above as described, exactly, then you now have a good Ventoy install of latest version, but /dev/sdX1 will be type exFAT and we want to change that to ext4, so start gparted, find that partition (make sure it is unmounted via right click in gparted), format it to ext4 and make sure to . You can copy several ISO files at a time, and Ventoy will offer a boot menu where you can select them. They do not provide a legacy boot option if there is a fat partition with an /EFI folder on it. Haven't tried installing it on bare metal, but it does install to a VM with the LabConfig bypasses. You literally move files around and use a text editor to edit theme.text, ventoy.json, and so on. I'm afraid I'm very busy with other projects, so I haven't had a chance. 1. privacy statement. Openbsd is based. I can confirm it was the reason for some ISOs to not boot (ChimeraOS, Manjaro Gnome). Tested on 1.0.77. So I think that also means Ventoy will definitely impossible to be a shim provider. ISO: GeckoLinux_STATIC_Plasma.x86_64-152.200719..iso (size: 1,316MB) . Indeed I have erroneously downloaded memtest v4 because I just read ".iso" and went for it. These WinPE have different user scripts inside the ISO files. By clicking Sign up for GitHub, you agree to our terms of service and How to make sure that only valid .efi file can be loaded. Thank you both for your replies. I'm hoping other people can test and report because it will most likely be a few weeks before this can make it to the top of my priority list @ventoy, are you interested in a proper implementation of Secure Boot support? I've tested it with Microsoft-signed binaries, custom-signed binaries, ubuntu ISO file (which chainloads own shim grub signed with Canonical key) all work fine. However, some ISO files dont support UEFI mode so booting those files in UEFI will not work. Ventoy Binary Notes: This website is underprovisioned, so please download ventoy in the follows: (remember to check the SHA-256 hash) https://github.com/ventoy/Ventoy/releases Source Code Ventoy's source code is maintained on both Github and Gitee. Have a question about this project? In Linux, you need to specify the device to install Ventoy which can be a USB drive or local disk. I rarely get any problems with other menu systems based on grub2\grub4dos\syslinux\isolinux, just Ventoy gives problems. @ventoy I have tested on laptop Lenovo Ideapad Z570 and Memtest86-4.3.7.iso and ipxe.iso gived same error but with additional information: netboot.xyz-efi.iso (v2.0.17), manjaro-gnome-20.0.3-200606-linux56.iso, Windows10_PLx64_2004.iso worked fine. Boots, but unable to find its own files; specifically, does not find boot device and waits user input to find its root device. Did you test using real system and UEFI64 boot? Optional custom shim protocol registration (not included in this build, creates issues). Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. Ventoy 1.0.55 is available already for download. It works for me if rename extension to .img - tested on a Lenovo IdeaPad 300. cambiar contrasea router nucom; personajes que lucharon por la igualdad de gnero; playa de arena rosa en bahamas; 1.0.84 IA32 www.ventoy.net ===> If someone uses Ventoy with Secure Boot, then Ventoy should not green light UEFI bootloaders that don't comply with Secure Boot. but CorePure64-13.1.iso does not as it does not contain any EFI boot files. 7. No bootfile found for UEFI! Preventing malicious programs is not the task of secure boot. VMware or VirtualBox) Follow the urls bellow to clone the git repository. Now Rufus has achieved support for secure boot as now NTFS:UEFI Driver is signed for secure boot by Microsoft. Do I need a custom shim protocol? But I was actually talking about CorePlus. Windows 10 32bit So use ctrl+w before selecting the ISO. I am just resuming my work on it. it doesn't support Bluetooth and doesn't have nvidia's proprietary drivers but it's very easy to install. https://abf.openmandriva.org/platforms/cooker/products/4/product_build_lists/3250 The user should be notified when booting an unsigned efi file. 6. If that is not the case already, I would also strongly urge everyone to consider the problem not as "People who want Secure Boot should perform extra steps to ensure that only signed executable will boot" but instead as "People who don't care about Secure Boot but have it enabled should either disable Secure Boot or perform extra steps if they want unsigned executables to boot". Sorry, I meant to upgrade from the older version of Windows 11 to 22H2. ventoy.json should be placed at the 1st partition which has the larger capacity (The partition to store ISO files). All the .efi files may not be booted. I think it's ok as long as they don't break the secure boot policy. If anyone has Secure Boot enabled, there should be no scenario where an unsigned bootloader gets executed without at least a big red warning, even if the user indicated that they were okay with that. And, unless you're going to stand behind every single Ventoy user to explain why you think it shouldn't matter that Ventoy will let any unsigned bootloader through, that's just not going to fly. Go to This PC in the File Explorer, then open the drive where you installed Ventoy. The injection is just like that I extract the ubuntu.iso and change/add some script and create an new ISO file. Ventoy is a tool to create bootable USB drive for ISO/WIM/IMG/VHD (x)/EFI files. Secure Boot was supported from Ventoy 1.0.07, but the solution is not perfect enough. Fix PC issues and remove viruses now in 3 easy steps: download and install Ventoy on Windows 10/11, Brother Printer Paper Jam: How to Easily Clear It, Fix Missing Dll Files in Windows 10 & Learn what Causes that. 3. Yes, I finally managed to get UEFI:NTFS Secure Boot signed 2 days ago, and that's part of why there's a new release of Rufus today, that includes the signed version of UEFI:NTFS. Maybe because of partition type When install Ventoy, maybe an option for user to choose. The program can be used to created bootable USB media from a variety of image formats, including ISO, WIM, IMG and VHD. And that is the right thing to do. First and foremost, disable legacy boot (AKA BIOS emulation). However, Ventoy can be affected by anti-virus software and protection programs. The MX21_February_x64.iso seems OK in VirtualBox for me. However, I'm not sure whether chainloading of shims are allowed, and how it would work if you try to load for example Ubuntu when you already have Fedora's shim loaded. I'll test it on a real hardware a bit later. Maybe I can get Ventoy's grub signed with MS key. backbox-7-desktop-amd64.iso - 2.47 GB, emmabuntus-de3-amd64-10.3-1.01.iso - 3.37 GB, pentoo-full-amd64-hardened-2019.2.iso - 4 GB In this case, only these distros that bootx64.efi was signed with MS's key can be booted.(e.g. You can grab latest ISO files here : Boot net installer and install Debian. DokanMounter @DocAciD I don't have a Lenovo, ThinkPad or a ThinkCentre, Getting the same on TinyCoreLiInux (CorePlus), URL; http://tinycorelinux.net/downloads.html, The ISO must be UEFI-bootable and have a UEFI64 boot file \EFI\BOOT\BOOTX64.EFI sol-11_3-live-x86.iso | 1.22 GB, gnewsense-live-4.0-amd64-gnome.iso | 1.10 GB, hyperbola-milky-way-v0.3.1-dual.iso | 680 MB, kibojoe-17.09final-stable-x86_64-code21217.iso | 950 MB, uruk-gnu-linux-3.0-2020-6-alpha-1.iso | 1.35 GB, Redcore.Linux.Hardened.2004.KDE.amd64.iso | 3.5 GB, Drauger_OS-7.5.1-beta2-AMD64.iso | 1.8 GB, MagpieOS-Gnome-2.4-Eva-2018.10.01-x86_64.iso | 2.3 GB, kaisenlinuxrolling1.0-amd64.iso | 2.80 GB, chakra-2019.09.26-a022cb57-x86_64.iso | 2.7 GB, Regata_OS_19.1_en-US.x86_64-19.1.50.iso | 2.4 GB. Option 2 will be the default option. The boot.wim mode appears to be over 500MB. plist file using ProperTree. ", https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_mYChRFanLEdyttDvT-cn6zH0o6KX7Th/view Legacy\UEFI32\UEFI64 boot? unsigned .efi file still can not be chainloaded. I assume that file-roller is not preserving boot parameters, use another iso creation tool. for grub modules, maybe I can pack all the modules into one grub.efi and for other efi files(e.g. Ventoy does support Windows 10 and 11 and users can bypass the Windows 11 hardware check when installing. Hiren does not have this so the tools will not work. . On the other hand, I'm pretty sure that, if you have a Secure Boot capable system, then firmware manufacturers might add a condition that you can only use TPM-based encryption if you also have Secure Boot enabled, as this can help reduce attack vectors against the TPM (by preventing execution of arbitrary code at the early UEFI boot stage, which may make poking around the TPM easier if it has a vulnerability). Well occasionally send you account related emails. I downloaded filename Win10_21H2_BrazilianPortuguese_x64.iso If the ISO is on the tested list, then clearly it is a problem with your particular equipment, so you need to give the details. to your account, Hello The same applies to OS/2, eComStation etc. Error : @FadeMind @pbatard Sorry, I should have explained my position clearer - I fully agree that the Secure Boot bypass Ventoy uses is not secure, and I'm not using Ventoy exactly because of it. That's actually very hard to do, and IMO is pointless in Ventoy case. And we've already been over whether USB should be treated differently than internal SATA or NVMe (which, in your opinion it should, and which in mine, and I will assert the majority of people who enable Secure Boot, it shouldn't). Google for how to make an iso uefi bootable for more info. see http://tinycorelinux.net/13.x/x86_64/release/ However, after adding firmware packages Ventoy complains Bootfile not found. boots, but kernel panic: did not find boot partitions; opens a debugger. Tested Distros (Updating) I don't have a IA32 hardware device, so I normally test it in VMware. access with key cards) making sure that your safe does get installed there, so that it should give you an extra chance to detect ill intentioned people trying to access its content. evrything works fine with legacy mode. Would MS sign boot code which can change memory/inject user files, write sectors, etc.? wifislax64-2.1-final.iso - 2 GB, obarun-JWM-2020.03.01-x86_64.iso - 1.6 GB, MiniTool_Partition_Wizard_10.2.3_Technician_WinPE.iso - 350 MB, artix-cinnamon-s6-20200210-x86_64.iso - 1.88 GB, Parrot-security-4.8_x64.iso - 4.03 GB Questions about Grub, UEFI,the liveCD and the installer. I would also like to point out that I reported the issue as a general remark to help with Ventoy development, after looking at the manner in which Ventoy was addressing the Secure Boot problem (and finding an issue there), rather than as an actual Ventoy user. I'm not sure how Ventoy can make use of that boot process, because, in a Secure Boot enabled environment, all UEFI:NTFS accomplishes is that it allows you to chain load a Secure Boot signed UEFI boot loader from an NTFS partition, and that's it. plzz help. Will these functions in Ventoy be disabled if Secure Boot is detected? If a user whitelists Ventoy using MokManager, it's because they want the Ventoy bootloader to run in a Secure Boot environment and want it to only chain load boot loaders that meet the Secure Boot requirements. @steve6375 Can it boot ok? And they can boot well when secure boot is enabled, because they use bootmgr.efi directly from Windows iso. | 5 GB, void-live-x86_64-20191109-xfce.iso | 780 MB, refracta10-beta5_xfce_amd64-20200518_0033.iso | 800 MB, devuan_beowulf_3.0.0_amd64_desktop-live.iso | 1.10 GB, drbl-live-xfce-2.6.2-1-amd64.iso | 800 MB, kali-linux-2020-W23-live-amd64.iso | 2.88 GB, blackarch-linux-live-2020.06.01-x86_64.iso | 14 GB, cucumber-linux-1.1-x86_64-basic.iso | 630 MB, BlankOn-11.0.1-desktop-amd64.iso | 1.8 GB, openmamba-livecd-en-snapshot-20200614.x86_64.iso | 1.9 GB, sol-11_3-text-x86.iso | 600 MB Hi, Gentoo LiveDVD doesn't work, when I try to boot it, It's showing up the GRUB CLI Ventoy is an open source tool to create a bootable USB drive for ISO/WIM/IMG/VHD (x)/EFI files. chromeos_14816.99.0_reven_recovery_stable-channel_mp-v2.bin fails to boot on BIOS & UEFI. The file formats that Ventoy supports include ISO, WIM, IMG, VHD(x), EFI files. md5sum 6b6daf649ca44fadbd7081fa0f2f9177 Passware.Kit.Forensic.2017.1.1.Win.10-64bit.BootCD.iso - 350 MB Snail LInux , supports UEFI , booting successfully. also for my friend's at OpenMandriva *waaavvvveee* For example, GRUB 2 is licensed under GPLv3 and will not be signed. You can't just convert things to an ISO and expect them to be bootable! So maybe Ventoy also need a shim as fedora/ubuntu does. debes activar modo legacy en el bios-uefi Yes ! In Windows, Ventoy2Disk.exe will only list the device removable and in USB interface type by default. @ValdikSS, I'm afraid I am fairly busy right now and, technically for me, investing time on this can be seen as going towards helping a "competing" product (since I am the creator of Rufus, though I genuinely don't have a problem with healthy competition and I'm quite happy to direct folks, who've been asking to produce a version of Rufus with multiboot for years, to use Ventoy instead), whereas I could certainly use that time to improve my own software . It woks only with fallback graphic mode. If everything is fine, I'll prepare the repo, prettify the code and write detailed compilation and usage instructions, as well as help @ventoy with integration. Secure Boot is supported since Ventoy-1.0.07, please use the latest version and see the Notes. So it is pointless for Ventoy to only boot Secure EFI files once the user has 'whitelisted' it. Yes. I have the same error, I can boot from the same usb, the same iso file and the same Ventoy on asus vivobook but not on asus ROG. I didn't expect this folder to be an issue. etc. mishab_mizzunet 1 yr. ago MediCAT Although a .efi file with valid signature is not equivalent to a trusted system. For the two bugs. The best workaround is to install some Linux variant (I use Fedora but Ubuntu and SUSE are supported) and install VirtualBox. Acronis True Image 2020 24.6.1 Build 25700 in Legacy is working in Memdisk mode on 1.0.08 beta 2 but on another older Version of Acronis 2020 sometimes is boot's up but the most of the time he's crashing after loading acronis loader text. Maybe I can provide 2 options for the user in the install program or by plugin. I remember that @adrian15 tried to create a sets of fully trusted chainload chains It gets to the root@archiso ~ # prompt just fine using first boot option. arnaud. You signed in with another tab or window. ISO file name (full exact name) Hiren's BootCD I can provide an option in ventoy.json for user who want to bypass secure boot. Have a question about this project? By clicking Sign up for GitHub, you agree to our terms of service and So it is impossible to get these ISOs to work with ventoy without enabling legacy support in the bios settings? I've made some tests this evening, it should be possible to make more-or-less proper Secure Boot support in Ventoy, but that would require modification of grub code to use shim protocol, and digital signatures for all Ventoy efi files, modules, etc. I'm considering two ways for user to select option 1. 4. When you run into problem when booting an image file, please make sure that the file is not corrupted. I adsime that file-roller is not preserving boot parameters, use another iso creation tool. This is definitely what you want. its okay. No bootfile found for UEFI, maybe the image doesnt support ia32 uefi error, asus t100ta Kinda solved: Cant install arch, but can install linux mint 64 bit. Now, if Microsoft finally relinquished their abusive policy about not accepting GPLv3 code for Secure Boot signing and Ventoy was updated not to allow unsigned bootloaders when Secure Boot is enabled (i.e. So I apologise for that. Which brings us nicely to what this is all about: Mitigation. Just some of my thoughts: Users may run into issues with Ventoy not working because of corrupt ISO files, which will create problems when booting an image file. Minor one: when you try to start unsigned .efi executable, error message is shown for a very brief time and quickly disappears. When ventoy detects this file, it will not search the directory and all the subdirectories for iso files. accomodate this. can u test ? PS: It works fine with original ventoy release (use UEFIinSecureBoot) when Secure boot is enabled. No bootfile found for UEFI with Ventoy, But OK witth rufus. function gennr(){var n=480678,t=new Date,e=t.getMonth()+1,r=t.getDay(),a=parseFloat("0. Ventoy Version 1.0.78 What about latest release Yes. en_windows_10_business_editions_version_1909_updated_april_2020_x64_dvd_aa945e0d.iso | 5 GB, en_windows_10_business_editions_version_2004_x64_dvd_d06ef8c5.iso | 5 GB all give ERROR on HP Laptop : Now there's no need to format the disk again and again or to extract anything-- with Ventoy simply copy the ISO file to the USB drive and boot it. Sign in This means current is ARM64 UEFI mode. 1All the steps bellow only need to be done once for each computer when booting Ventoy at the first time. Guid For Ventoy With Secure Boot in UEFI 1All the steps bellow only need to be done once for each computer when booting Ventoy at the first time. what is the working solution? When user whitelist Venoy that means they trust Ventoy (e.g. Many thanks! 1All the steps bellow only need to be done once for each computer when booting Ventoy at the first time. You can change the type or just delete the partition. So as @pbatard said, the secure boot solution is a stopgap and that's why Ventoy is still at 1.0.XX. 1.0.84 UEFI www.ventoy.net ===> 2. . Ventoy has added experimental support for IA32 UEFI since v1.0.30. Try updating it and see if that fixes the issue. And it's possible that the UEFI specs went as far as specifying that specific aspects of the platform security, such as disk encryption through TPM, should only be available if Secure Boot is enabled. The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: Please test this ISO file with VirtualMachine(e.g. If you get some error screen instead of the above blue screen (for example, Linpus lite xxxx). 1.0.84 MIPS www.ventoy.net ===> (I updated to the latest version of Ventoy). The user could choose to run a Microsoft Windows Install ISO downloaded from the MS servers and Ventoy could inject a malicious file into it as it boots. It's what Secure Boot is designed to do on account of being a trust chain mechanism that, when enabled, MUST alert if trust is broken. all give ERROR on my PC This ISO file doesn't change the secure boot policy. Thanks very much for proposing this great OS , tested and added to report. popstroke scottsdale opening date, 3 different types of turns in football,